Showing posts with label Art. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Art. Show all posts

Saturday, 2 June 2007

Appreciating Turkish music

Most westerners have difficulty with classical Turkish music, as does Darcy. But instead of closing our ears to it, it might be worth considering why this is the case. Darcy is happy to share his first impressions with the readers of this blog.

First, Turkish music is heterophonic. Turkish choral pieces invariably move in unison. Indeed, composers often only write one voice line; individual voices will transpose up or down by an octave. This is highly unusual in Western music. Though older western music will often be homophonic, this differs from heterophonic in that the interval is not a full octave.

Second, Turkish music does not use equal temperament. Western musicians long ago decided to forgo just intonation in favour of a compromise which allowed quick key changes. Thus was born equal temperament. Whatever the key used, the notes on the chromatic scale will be the same. This means that dependent on the key, most of the notes played will actually be off very slightly. Every western ear is therefore subliminally aware of a slight oddness in Turkish music - though the oddness is actually in the western system.

Third, Turkish music is microtonal. The western scale is split into 12 (the chromatic scale): C, C sharp, D, D sharp, E, F, F sharp, G, G sharp, A, A sharp, B. In western music, an example of a whole tone scale is: C, D, E, F sharp, G sharp, A sharp. At worst, the whole tones are divided into two, giving us the sharps and flats. In Turkish music by contrast a whole tone may be split into 9 "commas". (Fortunately, not all of the commas are used; Turkish music uses only 53 notes.) Not only does it mean that a C sharp for example does not exist in Turkish music (that would be 4.5 commas above C), but it creates huge problems for the western ear.

Not surprisingly, these three factors combine to create major problems in appreciating Turkish music. However, Turkish music also uses makam; "the concept used to codify phenomena of scale structure, interval structure, and melodic characteristics that underlie composition and improvisation". The makams give the piece part of its underlying structure. And the makam is accompanied by an usul, a formal melodic rhythmic cycle. While this makes Turkish music incredibly complicated, it adds to structural uniformity. And the human brain (hence ear) is appreciative of structure; hence, Turkish music is easier on the ear than the jagged dodecaphony of Schoenberg and his ilk.


While this may appear as a ray of hope for us, let us immediately remember that there are theoretically thousands of makams, though only about 100 - apparently - have been developed into musical settings. Which is the most popular, Darcy does not know. But a search of the net gives a great number in the Hicaz and Nihavend modes. Darcy is pleased to give a glimpse of the exotic key signature of the Hicaz (above) but also notes that the Nihavend (below) is essentially B flat major with microtones.



There is no moral to this story. Remembering an evening spent with a girlfriend listening to Korean classical music, by the end of which Darcy had developed a severe headache, he does not recommend that you listen to classical Turkish music in its hundred modes to develop a taste for it. But at least he hopes that the above will provide some understanding as to why you may not like it.

(Darcy is a poor musician; he welcomes informed comment.)

Wednesday, 30 May 2007

Thanksgiving and fancy

When Darcy is tired of stupidity, ignorance or even of life, he rises, places a certain CD is its player and presses the button. He then reflects on the extraordinary life of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. Darcy is not a particularly religious man. But listening to Mozart is a religious experience for him. Darcy did not always feel this way; his first favourite composer was Wagner (whom he still likes very much) and he then progressed to Mahler. But Mozart soon overwhelmed him. Darcy dates his conversion to when he heard Mozart’s first symphony – the one he composed at the age of eight in London, to while away the time while his father lay sick. This is a trifling work, but at the same time it is incredible. It holds up well against the mature works of all but the first rank of eighteenth century composers. Astounding.


In the minuscule part of his brain that is not occupied listening to the music, Darcy often ponders three questions. First, the inherent unfairness of life. Second, the bravery of genius. And third, what would have happened if Mozart had lived a normal span. To put this into perspective, Darcy noted down a list of first and second rate composers who were either a) born before 1700 and died after 1750 or b) were born between 1700 and 1800. (For those interested, the sample is: G.P. Telemann, Rameau, J.S. Bach, Handel, D. Scarlatti, Porpora, Tartini, Hasse, G.B.Sammartini, Pergolesi, Gluck, C.P.E. Bach, J. Stamic, L. Mozart, Goldberg, Piccinni, J. Haydn, J.C. Bach, M. Haydn, Paisiello, Grétry, Boccherini, K. Stamic, Cimarosa, Salieri, Clementi, Mozart, Cherubini, Beethoven, Spontini, Hummel, Paganini, Auber, Spohr, v. Weber, Meyerbeer, Hérold, Rossini, Schubert, Donizetti, and Halévy). In this sample of 41 composers, only Pergolesi, Goldberg and Schubert died at a younger age than Mozart. The average longevity of these composers is 65 years. The standard deviation of the sample is 17 years. Mozart's age at death of 35 is nearly two standard deviations below the mean! (Darcy also notes that Mozart's father died at the age of 68 and his sister at 78.)

Darcy believes that the composer of whom - among a host of others - Haydn said "I have often been flattered by my friends with having some genius, but he was much my superior", Beethoven exclaimed "That's Mozart saying 'here's what I could do, if only you had ears to hear' ", Rossini gushed "He is the only musician who had as much knowledge as genius, and as much genius as knowledge", and whose name was perhaps the last thing to pass Mahler's lips would have certainly given us more to be thankful had he not been untimely ripped from us.

Using the mean and s.d. of this sample, Darcy has extended his fanciful digression into what would have happened if Mozart had lived beyond 1791. Without any need to go to the extreme (one standard deviation above the mean, implying that Mozart would die in 1838 at the age of 82), the following strives to give some idea of the environment in which he would have lived.


One standard deviation below the mean
(1792 - 1804)

If he had survived to 48, Mozart would have additionally lived through: the murders of Gustav III of Sweden and Tsar Paul I; the storming of the Tuileries; the abolition of the French monarchy; the executions of Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette; the death of Leopold II (the penultimate Holy Roman Emperor); the second and third partitions of Poland; the start and the end of the Terror; the start and end of the French Revolutionary Wars; the Consulate and Empire in France; the start of the Napoleonic wars; the Code Napoléon; Paganini's debut as performer; the introduction of metric units; the first silk top hats; the invention of the voltaic pile, electrolysis, the Jacquard loom, the first steamboat, the first steam locomotive; the discovery of infrared and ultraviolet radiation, morphine and the first asteroids; and the deaths of Piccinni, K. Stamic, and Cimarosa.

In music, the period 1793-1804 would have seen Haydn complete the 12 London symphonies (Mozart would most probably have followed him to London in 1794) and publish the "Emperor" Quartet, "The Creation" and "The Seasons", Cherubini stage "Medée", Beethoven, the sonatas for Piano, Opus 27 and Opus 28 ("Moonlight" and "Pastoral"), the sonata for Violin, Opus 47 ("Kreutzer"), and symphony No. 3 in E-flat Major, Opus 55 ("Eroica"). J.N. Forkel would publish his "Life of Johann Sebastian Bach".


At the mean
(1805 - 1821)

If he had survived to 65, Mozart would also have witnessed: the abolition of the Holy Roman Empire and the Papal States; the restoration of the monarchy in France; the serial declarations of independence in Latin America; the start of the Greek War of Independence; the partial and temporary resurrection of Poland; the partial autonomy of Serbia; the cessions of Finland, Bessarabia and Norway; the abolition of the slave trade in England; the battles of Austerlitz, Jena, Wagram, Borodino and Waterloo; the Congress of Vienna; the introduction of the Austrian Civil Code; the two abdications of Napoléon; the first Oktoberfest; the Great Comet of 1811; the Year Without a Summer; the publication of Philosophie Zoologique and Frankenstein; the invention of the stethoscope; the discovery of the Venus de Milo; and the deaths of J. Haydn, Grétry, and Paisiello.

In music, the period 1805-1821 would have seen Beethoven complete "Fidelio", the sonata for piano, Opus 53 ("Appassionata"), symphonies No. 5 (Opus 67), No. 6 ("Pastoral" - Opus 68), No. 7 (Opus 92) and No. 8 (Opus 93), Spontini stage "La Vestale", Rossini stage "Tancredi", "L'Italiana in Algeri" and "Barbiere di Siviglia", Schubert compose "Der Erlkönig", Spohr stage "Faust" and Hummel finish the concertos for piano, No. 2 and No. 3.


What might Mozart have written?

The projection of Mozart's creative work in 1791-1804 is made simple by the fact that he was expected in London in 1794. Therefore, the mid-years of this decade would probably have emphasised further symphonies as well as a few piano concertos.
Knowing his luck, the British public would probably have pined for Haydn instead, and Mozart would have had to return to a continent in revolution. The death of Cimarosa would have left him as the European composer par excellence of opera buffa, and it is not altogether unlikely that a series of Italo-German singspiel-cum-operas would have ensued. Back in Vienna, Mozart would have admired Haydn's new oratorios and probably had another one of his revelations after listening to the Beethoven sonatas. After 1805, Mozart might have felt the onset of old age. The fires might have burned as brilliantly as ever, but the vessel would have become weaker. However, Darcy believes that he would have taken on the challenge of Beethoven's later symphonies and quartets while refining further the medium of opera, egged on by the upstart Rossini. Finally, a splendid requiem for Papa Haydn could have been expected. His final works would probably have been some of the most shocking sonatas ever composed.

Darcy does not believe that Mozart would have entered a dry phase, unable to fit the stirrings of Romanticism into his music. His reasoning is simple: almost from birth, Mozart thrived on variety. As a young child, he was exposed to almost every manner of composition then known. Unlike Haydn, who spent most of his life cloistered with the Esterhazy family, Mozart was not forced to be innovative. Instead, he became a musical chameleon, but one supremely adept at forcibly evolving his experience to a higher level than the music to which he had been exposed. Probably the best evidence for this comes in his symphony No. 41, "Jupiter". This is unlike many previous Mozart symphonies. Though old techniques such as fugue are employed (brilliantly), the symphony has a level of thematic development that is beyond Beethoven at 35. Darcy believes it would be silly to assume that the composer of "the greatest orchestral work of the world which preceded the French Revolution" would suddenly become mute. Instead he would probably have soaked in the newer works by Beethoven, Cherubini, Haydn, Hummel, Rossini, Schubert, Spohr and Spontini - liking much of what he heard, being inspired by some and hating other parts, but learning all the while.

Inspired by Beethoven and Hummel, Mozart would have composed symphonies in the 1800s and 1810s that would dwarf those of the 1780s and 1790s just as surely as they dwarfed his symphonies of the 1760s and 1770s. In concertos, Beethoven would have been a distant competitor, though in sonatas and quartets, he would have been formidable. It is not impossible to imagine a similar relationship here between Beethoven and Mozart as existed between Mozart and Haydn. In opera, Mozart would surely have been unmatched. A cursory glance at the programming for the 2007-2008 season at the Royal Opera House reveals more works by Mozart than anyone else; at the Metropolitan he is second to Verdi. Darcy believes that Mozart's later operas would have made Mozart the greatest opera composer who ever lived, without even the need to acknowledge competition from Verdi or Wagner.

It is worth remembering that the current, sixth edition of the Köchel catalogue lists over 630 works by Mozart, composed over a period of 30 years. Even assuming that his works after 1791 became twice as complex or long, and further assuming a halving of his productivity after 1811 when he would have turned 55, we can project something like a further 260 works over this period. Assuming that the 260 would have been broken down roughly in line with his compositions prior to 1791, we can assume that we would now cherish a further 9 operas, 19 symphonies, 22 sonatas, 11 concertos for piano, 9 concertos for other instruments, 10 quartets and 7 religious works, in addition to some 175 smaller pieces.

Mozart could have died at the age of 65 in 1821, surrounded by his wife and children (and quite possibly grandchildren), not wealthy but not poor, mourned by millions. Unfortunately for us, God's Beloved died 30 years too early. Yet let us be grateful that we have any Mozart in our collective memory. The world would be a poorer place today had he not lived. Of how many people can that be said?

The most incredible quartet in history

Thumbing through his usual Internet resources to check a few facts, Darcy stumbled upon a gem which he would like to share. In the Reminiscences published by the Irish tenor Michael Kelly, one encounters the following comment about a little musical get-together. The scene is Vienna, probably in 1785. The setting, the salon of Stephen Storace, an English musical émigré.

"Storace gave a quartet party to his friends. The players were tolerable; not one of them excelled on the instrument he played, but there was a little science among them, which I dare say will be acknowledged when I name them:

.....The First Violin:.............................Haydn.
..... " Second Violin:............Baron Dittersdorf.
..... " Violoncello:...............................Vanhal.
..... " Viola:.........................................Mozart.

...I was there, and a greater treat, or a more remarkable one, cannot be imagined
."

Haydn and Mozart require no introduction. August Carl Ditters von Dittersdorf was a musician in the employ of the Prince-Bishop of Breslau, whom the said P-B had ennobled and enriched so that he would not drift to pastures greener. He was vastly popular in his prime, coëval with Mozart and Haydn. Greatly esteemed, he was offered the position of K&K Kapellmeister by Joseph II - and declined. This was a position for which Mozart would gladly have given his eye-teeth. However, an unwillingness to move to Vienna permanently also meant that he is now practically forgotten. Jan Vanhal, who was unknown to Darcy until he read of this musical encounter, was apparently another successful composer and violinist.

This little musical event was also probably the time when Joseph Haydn told Leopold Mozart: “I swear before God, and as an honest man, that your son is the greatest composer known to me, either in person or by name.” To both Mozarts' gratification no doubt, though for vastly different reasons.

Darcy's mind is not often boggled, but it is now.

Friday, 18 May 2007

Ecstasy and rapture

In common with most modern men, Darcy uses the words ecstasy and rapture interchangeably, except when he's referring to the habits of the modern dancing savages. And one image is indelibly linked in Darcy's mind with ecstasy: that of St Theresa of Avila by Bernini, surely one of the most memorable statues to emerge from the chisel of an artist. St Theresa was a very well meaning 16th century nun, who entered the Carmelites, founded numerous convents, and was the first woman to be named Doctor of the Church by the Roman Catholic Church, albeit nearly four centuries after her death. Whatever the timeline, she is in very august company indeed.

The composition reflects St Theresa's own writings: "I saw in his hand a long spear of gold, and at the iron's point there seemed to be a little fire. He appeared to me to be thrusting it at times into my heart, and to pierce my very entrails; when he drew it out, he seemed to draw them out also, and to leave me all on fire with a great love of God. The pain was so great, that it made me moan; and yet so surpassing was the sweetness of this excessive pain, that I could not wish to be rid of it. The soul is satisfied now with nothing less than God. The pain is not bodily, but spiritual; though the body has its share in it, even a large one. It is a caressing of love so sweet which now takes place between the soul and God, that I pray God of His goodness to make him experience it who may think that I am lying."

Some have said that these words reflect St Theresa's repressed sexuality, others have called the sculpture pornographic. Certainly, a closer look at the face of St Theresa (more easily said than done, given the work's position) could be interpreted this way. But Darcy believes that whatever the cause for religious ecstasy - strange wiring of the brain, chemical imbalances or the presence of The One - there is a slight but definite divide. Though Darcy could of course be mistaken. Bernini loved his jokes.

On the other hand, St Theresa of Avila has never really been popular with Protestants, partly because her activities coincided with the Counter-Reformation, partly because of the fame of Bernini as a propagandist for the Catholics, and partly because some Protestants can be dour and unappreciative of the joys of life. Part of the reason for this post is the wish to share this remarkable artefact with a wider audience. Which brings Darcy to the second part of his post.

In the First Epistle to the Thessalonians, Paul states:

4.16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:
4.17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
4.18 Wherefore comfort one another with these words.

This has become quite famous in certain Protestant circles, and is in great favour with the Americans. It forms the basis for their belief in rapture. Gentle readers will no doubt be aware that before the word rapture became synonymous with ecstasy, it meant to transport someone. Hence 1st Thessalonians 4.17 describes a physical transport, not one of the senses. Much has been made of rapture. A great deal of discussion takes place in American Protestant circles with respect to its imminence. Some believe that the rapture is imminent, saying that all prophecies have been fulfilled. Others point to a check list that needs to be filled before it can take place. Apparently, the Bible states that the nations of the world must have unified their currencies; that peace must reign in Israel; that there will be a one world government; that the Temple must have been rebuilt in Jerusalem, animal sacrifices must have been reinstated - and the Anti Christ must have been be revealed.

Darcy's own religious feelings being one of agnostic deism, he finds such formulaic recitations tiresome.

However, imagine Darcy's delight when he yesterday found a wonderful Internet site to help him if he so chose. (After all, if someone as intelligent as Voltaire did not wish to pick quarrels with an infernal being, then Darcy may well decide the course of wisdom is to repeat such prudence with Something Infinitely Greater.) Simply put, it is a barometer of the Coming of the End. Called simply, the Rapture Index. Any readers wishing to find it can visit it here: http://www.raptureready.com/rap2.html. The index is linked to 45 variables, including such factors as liberalism, civil rights, and the price of oil. The site is regularly updated. As of 14th May, the RI stands at 158, which is at the upper end of "Heavy Prophetic Activity". Anything beyond 160 falls into the realm of "Fasten Your Seat Belts". Though why the Protestant editors of that site should wish either to make their bodily assumption more difficult by fastening themselves to mundane seats or to take their seats with them into the heavens is beyond me.

Darcy will henceforth take care not to equate ecstasy with rapture. Though Darcy is often bemused by religion, he will continue in this vein for a few posts, unless something interesting happens in the world around him.